By Baldmichael Theresoluteprotector’sson
24th May, 2022
The arguments over these medicines has been raging a while now, and many have argued why these are effective (or not). In my wrapping up the Covid 19 health issues this is something I must cover so that I can say I have checked. I am using Wikipedia as base information.
There is a summary and conclusions at the end.
It is on the World Health Organization’s List of Essential Medicines.
Above is its basic chemical formula. There is no nitrogen so I would say it was not neuro-toxic. There are some concerns re neurotoxicity in humans but I am suspicious of the sources for this. I strongly suspect fake news.
After its discovery in 1975, its first uses were in veterinary medicine to prevent and treat heartworm and acariasis (essentially parasites/mites).
This link explains more about its discovery etc. but is quite long. It is a part of a family of medicines called Avermectins.
The Wikipedia link says
During the COVID-19 pandemic, – which means it’s over?? –
misinformation has been widely spread claiming that ivermectin is beneficial for treating and preventing COVID-19. Such claims are not backed by credible scientific evidence.
Foot notes link EMA, European Medicines Agency as a credible source.
The review process of the European Medicines Agency regarding medical issues has been criticized for its lack of transparency. In a rebuttal of an EMS review that included her work, Louise Brinth, a Danish physician, noted that “experts” reviewing data remain unnamed and seem to be bound to secrecy. Minutes are not released and diverging opinions are not reported suggesting that all the “experts” are of the same opinion. In her view the process is unscientific and undemocratic.
The EMA is roughly parallel to the drug part of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
Oh, dear. Given the corrupted nature of the FDA, this does not fill me will trust for the EMA.
The other footnote is a link to ghostarchive.org website. This seems rather dodgy, and not the BMJ primary source anyway which surely should be used.
Multiple major health organizations, including the Food and Drug Administration, U.S. Centers for Disease Control, the European Medicines Agency, and the World Health Organization have stated that ivermectin is not authorized or approved to treat COVID-19.
Just because something is not authorized or approved, does not mean it is not safe.
It remains unclear if ivermectin is safe during pregnancy.
This article says
Antibiotic ivermectin selectively induces apoptosis in chronic myeloid leukemia through inducing mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress
Yes, quite. In plain English it kills the rogue cells by disrupting the shop floor of the cell factory like a communist trade unionist for example.
Or even more simply, putting a spanner in the works.
Today we see this on the internet, only they put spammers in the works.
India uses Ivermectin, Israel uses vaccines, which is doing better? Ivermectin of course, vaccines are pointless at best, harmful or dangerous at worst.
On using Ivermectin, vitamin C etc to detox
Comparison of Ivermectin with vaccines
Side effects, although uncommon, include fever, itching, and skin rash when taken by mouth
Ivermectin is considered relatively free of toxicity in standard doses (around 300 µg/kg).
One concern is neurotoxicity after large overdoses
The CDC advises against consuming doses intended for livestock or doses intended for external use and warns that increasing misuse of ivermectin-containing products is resulting in an increasing rate of harmful overdoses.
Some people can be rather dim and forget they are not horses, even though in the USA and other countries they may eat like one!!
Subsequent research failed to confirm the utility of ivermectin for COVID-19,
The foot note links in the main article says
Our confidence in the evidence is very low
Which essentially means the studies are considered insufficient to prove matters one way or another. But then the same applies to the vaccines, doesn’t it? Which is why governments are very keen that everybody take part in the trial of the vaccines to see if they work or die in the process. Or be maimed, whatever.
Were you aware you are a guinea pig if you take the vaccines? Mmm…let me think…no, I doubt you were. But hopefully you were sensible enough not to play Russian roulette with your body and not take them.
Based on the current very low‐ to low‐certainty evidence, we are uncertain about the efficacy and safety of ivermectin used to treat or prevent COVID‐19. The completed studies are small and few are considered high quality. Several studies are underway that may produce clearer answers in review updates. Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19 outside of well‐designed randomized trials.
This all seems to fly in the face of those clinicians who have said it clearly works.
And raise the question as to why vaccines are not considered in the same way.
But that’s easy as I have pointed out; to have a worldwide trial. Whether it is well designed may be difficult to ascertain, but would explain the different approaches by the various countries. And why it seems on the face of things not to make any sense at all.
Is the light dawning on you by any chance?
Anyway, this link which says there is evidence that ivermectin works.
Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease. The apparent safety and low cost suggest that ivermectin is likely to have a significant impact on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic globally.
Of course low cost is in everybody’s interest. Except big pharma and those who benefit who like high cost and lots of profit from selling something at low cost for exaggerated amounts. Sell you something which may harm or even kill you.
Given the evidence of efficacy, safety, low cost, and current death rates, ivermectin is likely to have an impact on health and economic outcomes of the pandemic across many countries. Ivermectin is not a new and experimental drug with an unknown safety profile. It is a WHO “Essential Medicine” already used in several different indications, in colossal cumulative volumes. Corticosteroids have become an accepted standard of care in COVID-19, based on a single RCT of dexamethasone.1 If a single RCT is sufficient for the adoption of dexamethasone, then a fortiori the evidence of 2 dozen RCTs supports the adoption of ivermectin.
So an existing safe medicine if correctly dosed subject to the individual’s needs, as opposed to an unsafe experimental vaccine which is expensive. And pointless in any event unless you like money and killing or harming people.
It is cheap, but subject to supply and demand of course.
Currently, ivermectin is commercially available and affordable in many countries globally.6 A 2018 application for ivermectin use for scabies gives a direct cost of $2.90 for 100 12-mg tablets.22 A recent estimate from Bangladesh23 reports a cost of US$0.60—US$1.80 for a 5-day course of ivermectin. For these reasons, the exploration of ivermectin’s potential effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 may be of particular importance for settings with limited resources.24 If demonstrated to be effective as a treatment for COVID-19, the cost-effectiveness of ivermectin should be considered against existing treatments and prophylaxes.
Cost in U.S.A. difficult to determine, this may vary enormously as people take advantage of supply and demand. People will still sell you something that works at excessive prices, but at least that is better than being sold something that doesn’t work at excessive prices, like vaccines for example.
Pfizer vaccine costs.
The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine may be priced in India under $10 dollars or Rs 730
Pfizer is charging the US $19.50 per dose.
Comparison Ivermectin and Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine
Vaccines are supposed to be preventative, not curative, so in reality one is not comparing like with like. However, consider this.
Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine has an average rating of 8.2 out of 10 from a total of 10 ratings on Drugs.com. 73% of reviewers reported a positive effect, while 0% reported a negative effect.
An outright lie! 8 out of 10 have some negative effect to varying degree, some quite severe. That is 80%!!!
As regards positive effects this is wrong. It refers to no or limited side effects, not that it actually worked as you cannot tell.
Note one was badly injured by polio vaccine but was happy with this vaccine.
Ivermectin has an average rating of 5.4 out of 10 from a total of 7 ratings for the treatment of COVID-19. 43% of reviewers reported a positive experience, while 43% reported a negative experience.
8 reviews, 1 did not put a figure out of 10. This one was positive, could have put a 10 when comparing to others.
The 4/10 rated one seems odd as it is clear a positive effect was experienced.
A 1/10 rated one say husband previously ill with diarrhoea so probably other issues and Ivermectin unsuitable.
A 1/10 rated one says she took it after a positive test, but no indication she was ill in the first place apart for the positive test, which could well be flawed.
If she took for 9 days as stated yet didn’t need it, then problems bound to arise.
I therefore consider 62% had positive experience, rounding down, 43% had a negative experience, rounding up.
As an aside there is this, one of the avermectins.
Extracted from above.
Abamectin is highly toxic to bees either if they consume or come in direct contact. However, plant parts exposed to abamectin spraying did not cause toxicity to bees 24 hours after treatment. The reason for lower toxicity in foliage is due to a half life <24 hours in plant surfaces.
You may note Abamectin is highly toxic to bees, perhaps because it has a ‘b’ in the name!
None of the other Avermectins have a ‘b’ in their name.
Trade names include Abba,
Like father (or the pop group!), even the heavenly Father. Interesting.
It is on the World Health Organization’s List of Essential Medicines.
Above is its basic chemical formula. There is nitrogen so I would say it was neuro-toxic. Its use is therefore suspect for Covid 19. However, it
is a medication used to prevent and treat malaria in areas where malaria remains sensitive to chloroquine.
Fever is the main issue with malaria.
In essence Hydroxychloroquine is acting to reduce fever symptoms as quinine has been known to do for many years.
With the ‘flu or Covid 19 as it is now known, and where fever is occurring, one could expect it to help.
However, drinking gin and tonic water, as my grandfather used to do, may well be just as good! Although he did do a gin and French (the French being a French vermouth, a wine/herb alcoholic drink) and I daresay this shows the benefits of herbs in wine.
However, I also recommend grapefruit and tonic as I found this very soothing if ‘flu symptoms seemed approaching and to keep the fever down or at bay.
NB Please note that not all tonic waters are created equal. Do not touch the artificial sweetener variety as the sweeteners are neuro-toxic.
I will have to do another post to highlight the issues of sweeteners, although there is good stuff out there on the net warning of the dangers.
Wikipedia says Hydroxychloroquine has a narrow therapeutic index, meaning there is little difference between toxic and therapeutic doses.
However, the foot note link appears to refer to Ivermctin which makes no sense. Does this reflect the standard of Wikipedia editing? Yes it most certainly does.
There are various side effects, but in general it appears this will be due to over dosing. Tonic water, that is the quinine in it, is bitter, so one would not want too much of that at any one time anyway. As a drug, Hydroxychloroquine is sold in tablet form, so probably much easier to overdose.
Tonic water which contains liquid will limit your exposure to high doses and give you fluids which your body will need to flush out the toxins.
Among studies that deemed hydroxychloroquine intake to cause harmful side effects, a publication by The Lancet was retracted due to data flaws.
This hardly inspires you with confidence on how studies are performed which wish to degrade an ‘Essential Medicine’.
However, it is in essence as I have said, neuro-toxic, so one would have to be careful on that basis. It is not a cure, more of a symptom reducer to help ease discomfort whilst your immune system gets on with the job of healing.
From April to June 2020, there was an emergency use authorization for their use in the United States, and was used off label for potential treatment of the disease. On 24 April 2020, citing the risk of “serious heart rhythm problems”, the FDA posted a caution against using the drug for COVID‑19 “outside of the hospital setting or a clinical trial”.
Their use was withdrawn as a possible treatment for COVID‑19 infection when it proved to have no benefit for hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19 illness in the international Solidarity trial and UK RECOVERY Trial. On 15 June, 2020, the FDA revoked its emergency use authorization, stating that it was “no longer reasonable to believe” that the drug was effective against COVID-19 or that its benefits outweighed “known and potential risks”.
This frankly is misleading at best. Its use is limited as described and, yes, once in hospital and severely ill, I daresay its benefits, if any, may be very limited. It won’t clear out toxins and could add to them.
Realistically the sick person needs intervention with vitamin C in large doses such at the Chinese were giving in early 2020 to respiratory diseased people.
But then I wouldn’t go near a hospital nowadays, with the ethical medics having left or been forced out because they won’t take a potentially harmful or deadly vaccine.
In 2021, hydroxychloroquine was part of the recommended treatment for mild cases in India. This seems sensible, and fits the pattern of its makeup.
It is sold under the brand name Plaquenil among others.
I am not going to list possible prices, but it doesn’t seem expensive.
Sweetener free tonic water.
I am not going to list possible prices, but will cost more than those with artificial sweetener. But then what price health?
The problem of cost is down to sugar tax. A cunning plan by big pharma to put more neuro-toxic substances into the unwary. The bastards.
Sugar may have issues, I have yet to do a detailed post, but not nearly as bad as neuro-toxic sweeteners.
Summary and conclusions
Ivermectin is showing that it can be used effectively to treat Covid 19, a.k.a. the ‘flu.
Hydroxychloroquine is showing that it can be used to moderate Covid 19, a.k.a. the ‘flu, but is neuro-toxic so use is very limited to fever reduction early on as I see it.
Most big pharma drugs are neuro-toxic and only moderate symptoms, and do not deal with the underlying cause, the toxins already in your body.
In reality, I consider you are better off getting artificial sweetener free tonic water from the supermarket etc. if you can if you have the onset of a fever, or going through one.
Mix with grapefruit juice is my suggestion, but really you need to flush out your system with plenty of clean water and anti-oxidant vitamin C. You could make your own mix, please note citric acid is NOT the same. Even vitamin C powders are not all created equal, but much better than big pharma drugs.
Ivermectin has been vilified even more than Hydroxychloroquine because of course it is more effective!
A trade name of Abamectin is Abba, like father, even the heavenly Father. You see, there is big clue in the word. Fathers are good for you, even the heavenly Father!
These are relatively low cost treatments compared to current vaccines, which in any event are part of a trial.
When the Bible talks about ‘trials and tribulations’ especially in the book of revelation, this is what it means.
I now speak to any who have had the vaccines and are still not wise to the fraud. If you take the vaccines you are being put through a trial. I do hope you realised this, but probably not.
After all nobody told you, did they, in advance?
Or maybe they did, and you weren’t listening? But this is what happens when you ignore God and go your own way. You suffer the consequences of your stupidity.
So do get a grip, and as old Baldy say, the cure to Covid 19 is in the name. C Or VItamin D, stress on the capitals.
D for protection in advance, and C for sorting you out if you get it.
D for daddy and the heavenly Father, C for cure, the curate of your souls.
P.S. If you need more information on Covid 19 and the various issues, including vaccines and Remdesivir, a supposedly anti-viral drug see here.
NB Please note the WHO is currently debating amendments to the pandemic provisions and seems to indicate a centralising of control. It seems to suggest that this will limit individual countries participation/choices in the matter.
In essence possibly giving big pharma/powerful lobbyists greater influence than before.
If you wish to object to the amendments there is a petition on the net.
P.P.S. A heads up to say that I hope to do a post on the Battle of Midway in early June. This was a turning point in the war in the Pacific, so one needs to be on ones guard as to what is going on, a good time to fight in my books to strike a tactical and strategic blow to the evil ones.
Exactly what that may mean I don’t know, but be encouraged by that.