Is God He or She?

By Baldmichael Theresoluteprotector’sson

16th March, 2022



Or indeed an ‘It’. Or is He a ‘He it’? Or a ‘She it’?

Or maybe a Hesheit? Confusing, eh? Well, not if you look closely at the matter, at least from the Bibles point of view.

But the problem is we don’t. Look closely that is. We have translations so the original text, but only in recent times has the internet given us access to the original Hebrew and Greek to help us understand more clearly.

In fact even in the translations it is fairly straightforward if you handle the words carefully, rather than jumping to conclusions.

It doesn’t help that men and women can be at loggerheads over this, the battle of the sexes as it were, Venus and Mars having a ding dong battle, rather than dancing round each other in mutual admiration, holding hands (or not).

Anyway, interestingly in the original Hebrew in the first verse of the Bible it says phonetically ‘A bereshit’. So maybe be God is a shit!!!

Or may be God just ‘shat’ down as God hath a lithp!!!

Nevertheless in the Bible God is considered as He, but this does not mean He is purely male or masculine in character.

After all, men are said to have a feminine side, and some men realise they are not in tune with it.

Of course, the truth is that God is male and female. It says as much in the first chapter of Genesis.

“Let Us make man in Our image, after Our likeness, …”

And

“So God created man in His own image; in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them.”

The word for image in Hebrew is bet-tseh’-lem in the phonetics. Which I only now realise as I type is incredibly like Bethlehem!!! Where Jesus was born!!!!!!!

Amazing! (add as many ! as you please). This is the Hebrew word below.

בְּצֶ֥לֶם

The symbols represent in sequence right to left, a house with a son or child (the dot in the middle), a tree or perhaps a bush, an angel, and a solid form. The last is a bit like a head with a quiff of hair!

You see, we are children of God, like trees, walking trees (we have bodies we call trunks), we are angels in spirit (some good, some bad) and we have a solid form that can be touched physically.

If we go back to the word for God, this is strictly a plural but a unified plural, equivalent to a family unit, that is a husband and wife, male and female.

Actually our understanding is that in the genes of humans, the male of the species has a ‘Y’ and an ‘X’ chromosome.

The female has 2 X of course. In the creation story the woman comes out of the man, Adam. The Lord God took an ‘X’ chromosome and fashioned the woman, whom Adam called Eve.

The female has 2 X. This is where ‘Let him (or her) who has ears to hear, let him (or her) let him (or her) hear’ comes in. X sounds like ‘eggs’. The female has two ovaries producing eggs. No doubt you will say ‘Eggactly’!!!

In the first verse of Genesis (or Genes is) the first letter in the Hebrew text is considered to be a Bet. Strictly this in incorrect as there is another before this, separate from the main text. It represents the number 1.

It is an Aleph, the first letter of the Hebrew alphabet. This is represented by a type of ‘X’ thus:

א

If you look closely at the Biblehub text you will see perhaps an image of slope, a hill side. There is a river coming out at the bottom left hand side and a tree to the right hand side.

The top of the tree is like an apostrophe and forms part of the other letters if you look closely.

There is one which stands on its own, the Yud, or Yod (like Yoda!!)

י

The Yud is the tenth letter and represents the heavenly Father as ‘floats’ as it were on the top line, floating in the heavens if you will.

The heavens from the text are considered masculine I understand.

The earth is considered feminine.

Strictly therefore we might consider as a pictogram the text saying ‘First there was an egg. In the egg was a seed, an apostrophe if you like which floating off became ‘Yud’ or ‘Yod’.

So in the beginning was God, one, both male and female in nature. They, in a sense, separated.

But they can be considered as a marriage, a marriage in the mind of God, two yet one or 1.

The theme continues in the word ‘Elohim’ or ‘Aleim’. It is considered masculine, but plural. The aleph and the yud are there, 2 of the 5 letters. The other letters can be explained but not here.

There are in fact 7 alephs in the first verse. 7 is the number of completeness.

The heavens is a covering for the earth, and represents the heavenly Father protecting the earth, the feminine side like the husband protects the wife. The earth is His beauty, His blue/green jewel in the heavens with fluffy white clouds.

But the earth, like a mother, is the source and nourisher of mans’ body, whether they are male or female. The spirit, the soul, comes from the Father. The two become one, as a Man and a Woman become one in marriage. This is why marriage is so important to Mankind as it is part of God’s own character.

It is also why the same-sex couples Act in the UK etc. is such a nonsense; it does not represent God. It is merely that whining scoundrel (I am being polite) Satan’s deceit on the nations.

Anyway, again we might write God as ‘god’. The ‘g’ represents the earth, the female, its tail down as it were into the ground.

The ‘d’ represents the heavens, the heavenly Father, its tail towards the sky or space.

In the middle is an ‘o’. This represents a bond of love between the two natures of God, the male and female.

It is like a ring, the circle of life and like a ring we use in marriage, a symbol of what marriage is intended to be.

Of course, Jesus came as a Man, and the witness of the apostles is that in Him is the fullness of God, so both male and female.

It is written ‘O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, who kills the prophets and stones those sent to her, how often I have longed to gather your children together, as a hen gathers her chicks under her wings, but you were unwilling!’

In welsh hen is ‘old’, so the sense is old mother hen fussing over her chicks, protecting them under her wings.

But then the real Man has both aspects, in his genes and to be expressed in his character as protector. Perhaps a resolute protector like me!!

Whether Jesus was partly bald is highly debatable, we are not told. Whether the heavenly Father would be bald if He came to earth is also highly debatable!

As to whom Michael is as an archangel is written about, although there is very limited text in the Bible, some suggest it refers to Jesus.

The Jehovah’s witnesses think so.

https://www.str.org/w/is-jesus-the-archangel-michael-

This site thinks so.

https://www.endtimes-bibleprophecy.com/is-michael-jesus-bible.html

This thinks not.

https://www.biblestudy.org/question/is-michael-the-archangel-jesus.html

Anyway, if Jesus was Michael and says ‘He who has seen Me has seen the Father’, then would the Father be a bald Michael, as in like father, like son?

Now there’s a thought.

But as to whether God is He or She, well, we say He because He is simpler and easier than saying ‘Heshe’ or ‘Heesh’. Unless perhaps we have been drinking too much alcohol and have become drunk!

As in ‘For heesh a jolly good fellow’ etc etc.

I don’t recommend drunk by the way, rots the liver etc. etc.

And we say ‘He’ because the husband, the male, is responsible for the protection of the female and that’s how it was meant to be. Most women underneath all the feminist bravado (or should that be bra-vado!) want security.

But a good marriage is a partnership where husband and wife dance as it were around each other, complimenting each other in their skills, as well as complimenting each other with praise and thanks.

And in space the heavens revolve round the earth as the earth spins like a dance. The heavenly Father round the earth Mother if you will.

But please note we do not worship the earth or Mother earth. We are to cherish the earth like a mother, tend and care for her as she sustains our bodies as the heavenly Father sustains our souls, our spirits.

In fact, the heavenly Father never asked for worship as such. He really just wanted to be a friend, to have His children as friends. So it is written Abraham was the friend of God.

And don’t forget the two greatest commandments; ‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength and with all your mind’ and ‘Love your neighbour as yourself.’

There is no mention of worship. But we give thanks to God because we are grateful, not because He demands it. And we can be grateful for the earth as Mother.

But stick with God as He, whilst remembering that He has His male and feminine side.

And if you think sometimes God can be a bit, well, shitty, just recall that in the beginning He ‘shat’ down. And accidents will happen!!!

A final thought. If you were to hear God laugh I think you would hear Him go ‘He, he, he!

Which I think says it all, don’t you?

P.S. You might like this regarding Jesus. For E’s a jolly God follow!

Bras and what to do with them

By Baldmichael Theresoluteprotector’sson

22nd January, 2022

I was inspired by the following post. I think it is very good.

Bras. They can go. Or can they?

By atribeofwomen on December 28, 2020

By Europe & Me‘s MythBuster

I note that the article was written by a Myth Buster. I thuppose she had a listhp!! And a very appropriate name with Bust-er!!!

Tho, sorry, so I thought I had better have a look as it were at the issue. Purely for research mind. I do like to keep a breast of things.

I doubt my wife will need my advice, but I would hate to make a myth-take or boob. And I don’t want to be a complete tit.

Anyway, here are the 4 main points in the article which I will use as my template. I quote from the text in italics, but do check the article anyway.

#Myth 1: Life was better off before the invention of bras

First off, bras were invented relatively recently. A certain French lady called Herminie Cadolle got sick of wearing stifling corsets — as all women must have been — and invented a two-part corset in 1889. Her invention was much more functional and (crucially) allowed breathing. She actually called her invention bien-être, which means wellbeing! In comparison to corsets which served the primary purpose of tightening the waist as much as possible to valorise hips and boobs, I’m sure the name was well deserved.

Well actually bras were invented a lot longer ago than 1889. Perhaps you didn’t realise?

Yes, you see in the book of Genesis Chapter 1 verse 1 it says in the Hebrew בְּרֵא א. Now, bear in mind they read right to left.

In the English this is equivalent to A bra!!! The first letter is ignored in translations because it is the Aleph used as the number 1, but it does count in this case (you can count numbers obviously!).

בָּרָ֣א is used again in the same verse so you have two bras!! One spare one I suppose.

So it is very reasonable to say that God, the angels, invented bras!!!

And don’t forget that in French, the word for arm is ‘bras’. Herminie Cadolle who invented the two-part corset as the article states was French.

Fascinatingly, her name has an anagram of ‘Eh moi Cinderella’. This makes sense, as Cinderella could now go to the ball in comfort!!! (you couldn’t make this up, could you??!).

And don’t forget that at a ball there may well be candela-bras to provide light to the event!

I have to say, I don’t know how any woman could stand wearing the corset which the bra replaced. The corset was I understand stiffened by whale bones. I really don’t think women would have a ‘whale’ of a time in them!!

I note that escort is an anagram of corset. Perhaps prostitutes use them as ‘Escorts’.

And also note the following part anagrams:

Eros – they were used for seduction

Sore – they could be uncomfortable

Rose –they could enhance your beauty.

 A few years later, the New Yorker Mary Phelps patented the first bra as we know it. She made it by sewing two handkerchiefs and some ribbons together. And why you ask? She wanted to dance and be able to move comfortably in her ball gown without the pain inflicted by corsets. Fair enough.

The above proves my point re Cinderella. And again, anagramming Mary Phelps produces the following among others.

Ply hampers – well modern bras are made of layers I believe, so this makes sense (hampers contain delicious things to eat!!). Honestly, you couldn’t make this up!

Hyper psalm – meaning ‘beyond a song of praise’. Women have no doubt been singing their praises (on the whole I imagine).

A helps my PR – and of course this means helps your Public Relations. A good bra does that.

In fact there are specific girls it can help including:

helps Amy PR
helps May PR
helps yr Pam

They might even help gentlemen pay, but pay what I don’t know.

helps Mr pay

#Myth 2: Everyone understands bra sizes

Consultations with a non-representative sample of all my friends show that many do not know their bra size (including yours truly).

I’ll just check. Mmm, nope don’t know. Hang on, silly me I’m a man so I don’t need a bra (unless you are speaking in French, in which case I have two strong arms, let me help).

A little bit of research also shows that bra sizes have fluctuated over the course of history. Beyond tailor-made bras, the original two sizes of the first bra slowly evolved towards Small to Large sizes until the introduction of cup sizes in the 1930s. These were far from today’s supposedly accurate sizes. Interestingly, cup sizes, as they are today, were officially introduced in 1975 in the European Common Market. Apparently, some British women were very confused by their introduction, “handed down from the antiseptic Common Market headquarters in Brussels”. Brushing aside the fact that priorities in the British public discourse remain straight at all times, it is worth pointing that bra sizes are not the same across the board. Like with any other clothes design, each brand has their own fitting system.

This goes to show how faceless bureaucrats in Brussels can make a boob of boob support. You really can’t legislate or regulate boobs, it just isn’t on, you know. And faceless bureaucrats in Brussels are a load of boobies, and we have no control over them.

But in the UK we are out of the EU are now trying to disentangle ourselves from the mess.

This is the article link re Common Market. I haven’t found anything of direct reference to any original regulations.

 More seriously, though, have you always had the same bra size? If so, it is probably wrong. Unsurprisingly bodies change and evolve over time – and so do boobs (I mean they can literally evolve on a weekly to daily basis but that’s another topic). It is important to consider because wearing the wrong bra size may potentially lead to muscle pains, back tensions and other things far from the essential wellbeing Herminie thought a bra should bring. So, when buying a bra, take your time, try it on if you can, don’t hesitate to return it if it doesn’t fit and ask for advice. There’s no shame in not knowing your size.

It should be pointed out that even individual boobs vary sometimes, the left from the right and vice versa. My wife’s do somewhat and from time to time I check just to make sure. That’s my excuse anyway.

Some bra size sites.

https://www.sugarcandybra.com/blog/bra-sizing

https://hauteflair.com/blogs/lingerie/bra-sizes

https://www.evasintimates.com/blog/uk-bra-sizes/

Useful Wikipedia site.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bra

#Myth 3: Bras cause breast cancer

I won’t venture into medical advice here; as my speciality is myth busting not medical care. However, I will point out that this myth dates back to 1995 when a book called dressed to Kill made that claim.

Personally I doubt very much that bras would do this, although they might affect your lymphatic system to a degree if poorly fitting.

But what is of much greater concern and this makes me really, really angry, is that cancers have by and large arisen out of the increasing toxins in the environment.

And therefore the cancer issue and treatment is basically a scam to promote the nasty (and Nazi) chemo drugs from big pharma.

I became aware of this because of my own (false) diagnosis by the NHS of a cancer in my neck. I now know this to be down to sodium nitrite in processed meat (bacon primarily) which leads to nitrosamines, a far more toxic product.

In my research I spoke to and had a session with a herbalist. She said that the mastectomy industry was merely licensed butchery which I knew by then was true. Utterly evil.

Angela Jolie apparently had her breasts removed due to an apparent risk of a so called inherited disease, but I am deeply suspicious about this as regards inherited diseases. It may well be down to toxic poisons but without further research it is difficult to tell.

However, I don’t suppose the medical industry which profits from this will want to look at this. The love of money is the root of all kinds of evil.

https://innerself.com/living/health/diseases-and-conditions/4624-breast-cancer-deception-by-sherrill-sellman.html

On a somewhat lighter note, when I heard Angela Jolie had had her mastectomy, I said to my wife ‘Well, if she doesn’t want them perhaps I could have them!’ After all they would make something comfortable to rest my head against in the bath!

#Myth 4: Bras are an embodiment of the patriarchal control over women’s bodies

Well, that is a tough one and I’m still making up my mind on it really.

They are in reality, or perhaps I should say real-a-titty, an embodiment or embodicement as bodice was an early form of support for women, of how women want to present themselves to men.

I rather doubt that is men who are trying to control women with bras etc. They would however, if they are like me, be quite happy to wrap their arms (or bras in French), round women to provide the necessary support.

And of course many men do like round women as they can be comfortable to be with.

As with all of us experiencing with fashion, bras have had ups and downs: periods they’d rather forget, rebellious periods and periods threading the line of sexiness obsession. But in all of these evolutions and throughout the bra history, I see women creating, designing, innovating and putting themselves first.

Indeed, bras have their ups and downs. Or as I like to put it, there are times when things go tits up, and times when they go tits down.

The 1920s flapper trend saw the emergence of bras used to flatten the breasts’ curves at a time when looking boyish was all the craze. On the other hand, the 1950s cone bras, solely designed with aesthetics in mind, allowed boobs to appear larger and pointier to fit to the glamour style of the times. If you don’t know what I mean, I’m sure Madonna will refresh your mind. And that’s an excellent example of re-appropriating a design and infusing it with a high dose of feminine power.

Which is perhaps the point in pointy bras, to make the point that women want to try and point out to men that they, women, want power. But women have always known how to use that power if they want to. Fluttering of the eyelids can be used to devastating effect I understand.

As regards ‘…the emergence of bras used to flatten the breasts’ curves…’ this reminds me of today and the flattening of the coronavirus Covid 19 curve. This I observe is part of the flapper trend of 2020’s when many people got in a flap over the ‘flu (honestly, you really, really couldn’t make this up!).

As mentioned before, the first bras were invented by women for women and with comfort and freedom of movement in mind. Interestingly, this is also the case of the sports bra, invented in 1975 because running with bras was so damn uncomfortable. Yet, it was then was seen as a feminist step towards getting rid of the torture devices that were bras.

I am not quite sure why it was a feminist step. It just seems plain common sense. But women will torture themselves unnecessarily to please the menfolk, even if they haven’t asked the said menfolk whether it is actually what the said menfolk want a female to do.

I certainly don’t want women to torture themselves, there is enough pain in the world thank you very much, without you adding more pain to your lives. Be kind to yourselves ladies, be kind.

And when you think about it, who in their right mind would invent conic bras for pleasure? And who thought push-ups would be an excellent idea, really just what I was missing this whole time? It is probably fair to say that, while women may have been more prominent in the bra industry compared to other industries, we’ve come a long way since the first bra design and I doubt comfort, practicality and self-care have always been a priority since… Displaying and sexualising a body part that men tend to be obsessed with on the other hand likely came into the picture. Shocking.

Again, I really do think women must share a part in the blame for this. You really don’t have to follow fashion. I don’t but then I’m a MAN, so what do I know? Quite a lot actually.

Whether we’re only slowly opening the carcan of boob oppression or reinventing ways of empowering women, the jury is still out. Either way, I think this is heading towards positive change. And the rising number of brands launching with the sole purpose of creating comfortable, practical, pretty and all-round satisfying underwear is making me hopeful about those remerging bra days. I won’t lie though, the real change will come about when pointy nipples are allowed into the meeting room.

The reference to carcan means the bra as an instrument of torture. Well, I hardly think it is that. However, if it is ill-fitting then of course it is torture. But are you self-inflicting pain on yourselves?

Cancra anagram is singular of cancrum meaning crab in Latin. Which means ‘cancer’ as in the star symbol. And cancer is a torture inflicted on us by toxins in the environment made worse by big pharma and its wretched so-called treatments.

Anyway, have a heart women; men need to be considered in the equation. Pointy nipples are great but men like me do get distracted by them, perhaps women do to. It is like another pair of eyes, and women’s eyes are beautiful.

Unless the women are bad as the eyes are the lamp of the soul as Jesus said.

‘But if your eyes are bad, your whole body will be full of darkness. If then the light within you is darkness, how great is that darkness!’

So going back to Genesis (which means in essence ‘origins’) we had בְּרֵא א A bra. This can be broken down into

א = a =God

בְּ = b = son

רֵ = r = father

א = a = God.

The whole is ‘God son, father God’. Jesus said I and the Father are one.

And it is written ‘The eternal God is your dwelling place, and underneath are the everlasting arms.’

I say to all you beautiful ladies, great and small, your breasts are in your hands as it were, as regards bras or no bras. But you are in the arms or bras of God.

So in the beginning God bras…

P.S. If you would like, why not listen to this by Billy Swan, ‘I can help’

Here are the lyrics, they say it all.

If you got a problem, don’t care what it is

If you need a hand, I can assure you this

I can help, I got two strong arms

I can help

It would sure do me good, to do you good

Let me help

It’s a fact that people get lonely, ain’t nothing new

But a woman like you, baby should never have the blues

Let me help, I got two for me

It would sure do me good, to do you good

Let me help

When I go to sleep at night you’re always a part of my dream

Holding me tight and telling me everything I wanna hear

Don’t forget me baby, all you gotta do is call

You know how I feel about ya, if I can do anything at all

Let me help, if your child needs a daddy, I can help

It would sure do me good to do you good

Let me help

[Musical Interlude]

When I go to sleep at night you’re always a part of my dream

Holding me tight and telling me everything I wanna hear

Don’t forget me baby, all you gotta do is call

You know how I feel about you, if I can do anything at all

Let me help, if your child needs a daddy, I can help

It would sure do me good to do you good

Let me help